4/24/2021 0 Comments Prism Plus Code
The FAA referred to is Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA), and not the Federal Aviation Administration, which is more widely known by the same FAA initialism.The subheader reads Collection only possible under FAA702 Authority.
![]() ![]() Transcript of body: Whenever your targets meet FAA criteria, you should consider asking to FAA. Emergency tasking processes exist for imminent immediate threat to life situations and targets can be placed on illegible within hours (surveillance and stored comms). Get to know your Product line FAA adjudicators and FAA leads. Bush Administration but was widely criticized and challenged as illegal, because it did not include warrants obtained from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. PRISM was authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. In 2012 the act was renewed by Congress under President Obama for an additional five years, through December 2017. According to The Register, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 specifically authorizes intelligence agencies to monitor the phone, email, and other communications of U.S. U.S. 36. These internet communications are not collected in bulk, but in a targeted way: only communications that are to or from specific selectors, like e-mail addresses, can be gathered. Under PRISM, theres no collection based upon keywords or names. Under this directive, the provider is legally obliged to hand over (to DITU) all communications to or from the selectors provided by the government. DITU then sends these communications to NSA, where they are stored in various databases, depending on their type. These kinds of queries became known as back-door searches and are conducted by NSA, FBI and CIA. Greenwald said low level Analysts can, via systems like PRISM, listen to whatever emails they want, whatever telephone calls, browsing histories, Microsoft Word documents. And its all done with no need to go to a court, with no need to even get supervisor approval on the part of the analyst. They contain numerous inaccuracies. He went on to say, Section 702 is a provision of FISA that is designed to facilitate the acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning non-U.S. United States. It cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. U.S. person, or anyone located within the United States. Clapper concluded his statement by stating, The unauthorized disclosure of information about this important and entirely legal program is reprehensible and risks important protections for the security of Americans. On March 12, 2013, Clapper had told the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the NSA does not wittingly collect any type of data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans. Clapper later admitted the statement he made on March 12, 2013, was a lie, 49 or in his words I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner by saying no. And federal judges are overseeing the entire program throughout. He also said, You cant have 100 percent security and then also have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. You know, were going to have to make some choices as a society. In separate statements, senior Obama administration officials (not mentioned by name in source) said that Congress had been briefed 13 times on the programs since 2009. All such information is obtained with FISA Court approval and with the knowledge of the provider based upon a written directive from the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence. It said that the attorney general provides FISA Court rulings and semi-annual reports about PRISM activities to Congress, providing an unprecedented degree of accountability and transparency. Democratic senators Udall and Wyden, who serve on the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, subsequently criticized the fact sheet as being inaccurate. The fact sheet was withdrawn from the NSAs website around June 26. In a joint statement, they wrote, Gen Alexanders testimony yesterday suggested that the NSAs bulk phone records collection program helped thwart dozens of terrorist attacks, but all of the plots that he mentioned appear to have been identified using other collection methods. Several lawmakers declined to discuss PRISM, citing its top-secret classification, 65 and others said that they had not been aware of the program. After statements had been released by the president and the Director of National Intelligence, some lawmakers began to comment. We passed specific provisions of the act that allowed for this program to take place, to be enacted in operation. Im going to be asking the internet providers and all of the phone companies: ask your customers to join me in a class-action lawsuit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |